![]() ![]() I was pretty aware of Mixcraft's limitations at that time, so I didn't try to do something I knew it was not capable of doing. ![]() When I used Mixcraft for the first time I was 100% indoctrinated to Sonar, yet in that first session I immediately adapted to Mixcraft. My point was that in terms of general workflow, and that if Mixcraft has the capability, getting to and using it is incredibly transparent. Yours are pretty specific requirements that I'm not too sure are the kinds of things that people here are generally talking about when they discuss workflow problems in foreign DAWs. My comment was not actually directed to your initial questions concerning the event editor and stave display. Hi Michael, Yes, I am aware that yours are very specific requirements which are not accommodated by Mixcraft. Cubase is probably the only other DAW that would work for me, but Reaper is fine so far. Fortunately, Reaper has a great notation editor, and an event list that is identical to Sonar's, so it works for me. It would be very hard for me to use a DAW that doesn't have these. ![]() For me, since I learned on Sonar, I developed a workflow where staff view (for all instruments, not just one) and Event List became very important for me. Michael diemer John, I'm glad that Mixcraft works well for you. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |